Material Detail
Lecture 15 - Backward induction: chess, strategies, and credible threats
This video was recorded at ECON 159 - Game Theory. We first discuss Zermelo's theorem: that games like tic-tac-toe or chess have a solution. That is, either there is a way for player 1 to force a win, or there is a way for player 1 to force a tie, or there is a way for player 2 to force a win. The proof is by induction. Then we formally define and informally discuss both perfect information and strategies in such games. This allows us to find Nash equilibria in sequential games. But we find that some Nash equilibria are inconsistent with backward induction. In particular, we discuss an example that involves a threat that is believed in an equilibrium but does not seem credible. Reading assignment: Strategies and Games: Theory And Practice. (Dutta): Chapters 11-12 Strategy: An Introduction to Game Theory. (Watson): Chapter 21 Resources: Blackboard Notes Lecture 15[PDF]
Quality
- User Rating
- Comments
- Learning Exercises
- Bookmark Collections
- Course ePortfolios
- Accessibility Info
More about this material
- Mobile Compatibility:
- Not specified at this time
- Language:
- English
- Cost Involved:
- No
- Source Code Available:
- No
- Creative Commons:
-
This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
