Peer Review

A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction

Material Detail page

Reviewed:: Oct 9, 2025 by Teacher Education

Bookmark

Ratings

Overall Rating:

Content Quality:

Effectiveness:

Ease of Use:

Overview:

A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction is an integrated approach to mathematics that centers Black, Latinx, and Multilingual students in grades 6-8, addresses barriers to math equity, and aligns instruction to grade-level priority standards. The Pathway offers guidance and resources for educators to use now as they plan their curriculum, while also offering opportunities for ongoing self-reflection as they seek to develop an anti-racist math practice. The toolkit “strides” serve as multiple on-ramps for educators as they navigate the individual and collective journey from equity to anti-racism.

Type of Material:

Reference Material

Recommended Uses:

A resource hub for educators and leaders to deepen their understanding of equity-centered math teaching and to access practical tools for implementing anti-racist, culturally responsive math instruction. It is designed to support professional growth, foster reflective practice, and guide systemic change toward more just and inclusive math education.

This material can be used to support teachers in shifting their instructional practices to provide meaningful access to priority content while ensuring that those practices are research- and assets-based, and culturally responsive.

Technical Requirements:

Internet access and Adobe (or compatible tool) to download artifacts

Identify Major Learning Goals:

The primary goal of EquitableMath.org is to promote equity-centered teaching and learning in mathematics education. The site aims to equip educators, school leaders, and policymakers with knowledge, strategies, and resources that foster equitable math instruction. It seeks to dismantle systemic barriers and biases in math education to ensure all students, especially those historically marginalized, have access to high-quality, empowering, and culturally responsive math learning experiences. The overarching purpose is to shift mindsets and instructional practices toward anti-racist and justice-oriented math education that supports diverse learners’ success and engagement.

Users will be able to develop anti-racist and culturally responsive math curricula.

Target Student Population:

College Upper Division, Graduate School, Professional

Prerequisite Knowledge or Skills:

Basic understanding of K-12 math curriculum and instructional practices.
Openness to learning about systemic inequities, racial justice, and culturally responsive pedagogy in education.
Willingness to engage in critical reflection on personal beliefs and instructional habits.
Foundational knowledge of equity concepts in education is helpful but not strictly required, as the site provides resources for various levels of familiarity.

Content Quality

Rating:

Strengths:

This material represents current knowledge and resources related to culturally relevant pedagogy.

The resource demonstrates organizational structure, addresses an important topic (equity in mathematics education for grades 6-8), and a toolkit provides a year-long reflective framework for teachers and includes detailed monthly exercises aligned to California teaching standards.

Concerns:

The materials rely heavily on contested theoretical frameworks (particularly the Jones and Okun "white supremacy culture" characteristics) that have been criticized for oversimplifying complex educational issues and potentially conflating standard pedagogical practices with racism. While the resource offers some practical classroom strategies, much of the content focuses on ideology and teacher self-reflection rather than evidence-based instructional methods proven to improve student mathematics achievement.

Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching Tool

Rating:

Strengths:

The resource's most notable features for potential effectiveness are its structured monthly reflection framework that could promote sustained teacher self-examination throughout the school year, and its explicit connection to grade-level content standards which ensures academic rigor remains part of the conversation.

This toolkit offers very helpful and practical steps that teachers can follow as they develop anti-racist math practice and materials.

Concerns:

The material lacks empirical evidence of improving student mathematics achievement, focuses predominantly on ideological frameworks rather than proven instructional strategies, and has generated significant controversy for potentially conflating standard pedagogical practices with systemic racism—which may undermine teacher confidence and distract from evidence-based methods that actually improve outcomes for struggling students.

Ease of Use for Both Students and Faculty

Rating:

Strengths:

The resource demonstrates good organizational structure with clearly labeled "strides" (modules), a monthly calendar framework that teachers can follow sequentially, and downloadable PDF workbooks that are well-formatted with consistent templates for reflection exercises.

The website provides straightforward navigation to key materials, and each monthly section follows a predictable five-step process (Engage, Reflect, Plan, Act, Reflect) that creates consistency for users, though the dense theoretical content and extensive time commitment required (year-long implementation with monthly exercises) may present practical barriers for busy teachers seeking immediate, actionable classroom strategies.
The resource demonstrates good organizational structure with clearly labeled "strides" (modules), a monthly calendar framework that teachers can follow sequentially, and downloadable PDF workbooks that are well-formatted with consistent templates for reflection exercises.
The website provides straightforward navigation to key materials, and each monthly section follows a predictable five-step process (Engage, Reflect, Plan, Act, Reflect) that creates consistency for users.

Concerns:

The dense theoretical content and extensive time commitment required (year-long implementation with monthly exercises) may present practical barriers for busy teachers seeking immediate, actionable classroom strategies.

Other Issues and Comments:: While organizationally coherent with clear monthly modules, the material focuses predominantly on teacher belief systems rather than actionable, research-validated pedagogical strategies, and the significant time investment required (monthly exercises throughout a school year) may limit practical adoption by classroom teachers seeking immediate instructional improvements.
Creative Commons: